The nation is in the final hours leading up to the United States officially hitting the debt ceiling and where do we stand? What have we learned? What have we gained during these 15+ days of government shutdown? Is perception really our new truth in the United States of America? The best media campaign wins out over empirical truth? I suppose, it helps immensely to have the media bias in covering recent events on your side.
How’s this for perception: President Obama has said that he will veto any bill which includes the Vitter Amendment (previously passed in the Senate, but yet to be voted on by the House). The Vitter amendment would require that all members of Congress, the Vice President, the President and members of the Cabinet be bound by the new healthcare law and enter into the exchanges without the 72% subsidies the Obama Administration unilaterally (without a legitimate vote of Congress) added to the healthcare law after it had been passed into law.
How’s this for perception: President Obama has said that he will veto any bill which includes the Vitter Amendment (previously passed in the Senate, but yet to be voted on by the House). The Vitter amendment would require that all members of Congress, the Vice President, the President and members of the Cabinet be bound by the new healthcare law and enter into the exchanges without the 72% subsidies the Obama Administration unilaterally (without a legitimate vote of Congress) added to the healthcare law after it had been passed into law.
The above has got to be the pinnacle of hypocrisy! President Obama and Democratic members of
Congress absolutely refuse to be bound by a law which you and I, the ordinary
citizens of this nation, are being forced to comply with. What does that say about the quality of the
product being delivered by Obama-care????
In my humble opinion, if members of Congress are willing to sign-off
on this hypocrisy then America is as good as gone. We will no longer be a true democratic
republic. Quite frankly, I’d rather
flirt with default on the national debt –which will not happen for at least
another month according to leading economists— than capitulate to the demands
of a would be group of tyrants (i.e., who will not negotiate, period and furthermore have repeatedly demonstrated --with aide of a blatantly biased liberal media-- that the current administration thinks they are above any accountability to the American people*). Obama-care is at best “taxation
without equal representation” and at its worst it is the crossing of a line
which will forever-more fundamentally transform our nation, as the momentum of
this unruly behemoth drags our nation further on the down the road toward
socialism and control of the individual for the “greater good.”
To Democratic voters who repeatedly (mindlessly) state “We
won the election and Obama-care is the law of the land”, I have only this to
say. Winning the Presidency of the
United States does not establish the President as the supreme monarch. Furthermore we are not a true democracy, we
are in fact a Democratic Republic. That
is to say that “we the people” elect representatives to act on our behalf in
government, via the Congress (House of Representatives and the Senate). The latter provides a layer of insulation to
prevent the uniformed masses destroying our nation. The latter being said, it is readily apparent that way too many members of Congress these days are seriously neglecting to listen to 'the voice' of the constituents who put them in office. Furthermore, as for this “law of the land”: if you truly understood government in any
meaningful way, shape or form you would readily acknowledge the fact that there
is a distinct difference between a law that is “passed by Congress”, “signed by
the President” and “upheld by the Supreme Court” and the healthcare law that
has been subsequently modified by President Obama and his administration –
thereby subverting a legitimate vote of Congress— in order to exempt the
President, Vice President, the Cabinet, members of Congress, Big Business and
Unions from being legally bound to participate in the new healthcare law in the manner which you and I
–ordinary citizens—will henceforth be required to partake.
* It should be noted --since the mainstream media didn't do its job in relaying the entire story to the American people-- that in the early days of the government shutdown Republicans passed numerous concurrent resolutions to fund critical parts of government, sending them over to the Senate for a vote --in hopes of implementation-- but these concurrent resolutions never saw the light of day on the Senate floor thanks to the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, acting on order from the White House/President. So in essence it was the Democrats who were choosing to maximize the hurt inflicted upon the American people by keeping government shutdown (in particular the denial of death benefits to be paid to military families of U.S. soldiers killed recently in Afghanistan) ... though in truth, the shutdown was only a partial shutdown as 83% of government remained operational during the course of the "shutdown."
It should also be noted, regarding the denial of death benefits for surviving family members of soldiers killed in Afghanistan: The President could have immediately rectified the Pentagon’s error in denying death benefits to these grieving family members with a simple stroke of his pen via an executive order. The latter case of death benefits being denied to surviving military family members is a perfect example of a situation where the use of the president’s power to use the executive order is entirely appropriate. The President, however, chose not to use his power of executive order, opting instead to wait for the U.S. House of Representatives to pass additional legislation that would clarify the intent of the previously passed “Pay Our Military Act” --which the House had passed in the early days of the initial partial government shutdown.
11/10/2013 Found another great petition ... LiveByYourLaws.com
It should also be noted, regarding the denial of death benefits for surviving family members of soldiers killed in Afghanistan: The President could have immediately rectified the Pentagon’s error in denying death benefits to these grieving family members with a simple stroke of his pen via an executive order. The latter case of death benefits being denied to surviving military family members is a perfect example of a situation where the use of the president’s power to use the executive order is entirely appropriate. The President, however, chose not to use his power of executive order, opting instead to wait for the U.S. House of Representatives to pass additional legislation that would clarify the intent of the previously passed “Pay Our Military Act” --which the House had passed in the early days of the initial partial government shutdown.
11/10/2013 Found another great petition ... LiveByYourLaws.com
No comments:
Post a Comment